Nobel Prize Laureate Inventor Of PCR Test: “Fauci is a liar”. So Is There An Actual Coronavirus Here? Probably Not.

Apparently, there is still considerable and justified doubt that there actually is a “new virus” making people sick.  This will explain why the PCR test is intentionally designed to run 45 cycles looking for the smallest tidbit of a gene match in order to declare a “virus”.  Dr. Fauci is, as the CREATOR of the PCR test says himself, “a liar who abuses the PCR test for an agenda“. Yes, the Nobel Prize Laureate inventor of the PCR test states plainly that Fauci is a liar.  

“The strategy for locking us down again is based on these fraudulent tests.  The magnified tests that don’t measure the quantity of anything.  It’s the same strategy Fauci used to make a lot of money for a lot of people.  It’s not just the PCR test, all these rapid tests, every one of them, they’re all NON-QUANTITATIVE tests.  There’s no such thing as a non-quantitative test, it’s a lie, an obvious fraud.  We’re locking everybody down over brainless lies.  The only reason they were able to get away with this is because they’ve turned us into an idiocracy, that was the whole point of the government schools.”

Ok, so we have abundant proof that Fauci is a liar, and specifically about the so-called Covid-19 “virus”.

Fascinating information on the lying fraud that Fauci is proven to be here:

More precision bombing on Fauci’s qualifications and credibility re the “pandemic”

This information lends great strength to this article, written and researched by John Rappaport.  Rappaport is a hard-working, intelligent fact investigator.  I have read his work for years and cannot complain about anything I have read.  About a year ago, Rappaport wrote and published his position on the existence of SARS-CoV-2.

He still stands by it, and you need to read this.

It’s worth revisiting. File it under: “follow the actual science.”

If researchers had actually been interested in proving the virus exists, they would have a conducted a large-scale study. Here it is.

Take 500 people who have been diagnosed with the pandemic disease, line them up, and take swab samples from them.

Using correct and meticulous procedures, which involve centrifuging those samples, produce 500 clear electron microscope photos—one good photo for each sample.

Place the 500 photos side by side, and answer the following questions:

One: In each and every photo, do you see MANY particles of what is unmistakably a virus?

Two: In each and every photo, are these particles the same virus?

Three: Are these particles of a virus you’ve never seen before?

If you answer any of the three questions with a no, you go back to the drawing board. Your attempt to prove the existence of a new virus which is causing disease has failed. (You might have shown a new virus exists, but it is non-relevant, because you haven’t shown it is causing disease.)

If you answered yes to the three questions, you bring in a new team of researchers, who enroll a new group of 500 volunteers who have been diagnosed with the pandemic disease, and they conduct the same experiment. Why? Because confirmation of results by an independent group is part of what is called the scientific method. At one time, every high school student was taught the scientific method.

If this new group of researchers carries out the study and answers no to any of the three questions, the attempt to prove a new virus exists and is causing disease has failed.

If the new group answers yes to the three questions, a third group of researchers would enlist 500 new volunteers and carry out the test once again. This would constitute further confirmation.

If this third group answers yes to the three questions, then you have strong evidence. (Of course, the electron microscope is registering dead virus. It isn’t looking at viruses in action or motion in the body. So it isn’t infallible.)

Now you see the futility of claiming that samples taken from one, two, or three patients in a study prove anything at all.

Correct studies of this kind should always use large numbers of people. For example, what would you say to the clinical trial of a new drug that only enlisted three people as volunteers? Would the outcome be sufficient to apply for FDA approval of the drug? Of course not.

The large-scale study—with confirmation—I’ve described above has never been done in the case of “COVID-19.”

Therefore, no proof exists that SARS-CoV-2 is real and is causing disease.

The burden of proof rests with the researchers who assert that SARS-CoV-2 is real and is the cause of a pandemic.

They have told that story. Since their story can’t be backed up, there is no reason to believe in the existence of SARS-CoV-2.

I could say a new measles virus or a new hepatitis virus or a new virus from outer space is causing a pandemic, but that, too, would just be a story.

Reprinted with permission from Jon Rappoport’s blog.

So you see, this ‘pandemic” is not about an actual threat.  It is about choking the global economy and reducing the global population.  It is about getting everyone INJECTED.  It is the big move on the chessboard of antichrist globalist governance.

IMPORTANT - The Confirmation Link was just emailed to you when you clicked "Subscribe". Please take 20 seconds and click the confirmation link in your email, then come right back here and learn.

IMPORTANT - The Confirmation Link was just emailed to you when you clicked "Subscribe". Please take 20 seconds and click the confirmation link in your email, then come right back here and learn.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Welcome To The War
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x