Life Insurance VS Covid-19 “Vaccinations” or Insurance Companies VS Pharmaceutical Companies: Round One Goes To

It is good to see some wisdom on display regarding the Covid-19 Vax VS life insurance. Not surprisingly, the winner of Round One is

the insurance company. Legally, at least in this case, a person dying from an experimental injection dies from “suicide”. Yes, taking the Covid-19 vaccinations/jabs/injections and subsequently dying is by law considered a suicide by that court.  No life insurance claim must be paid.  The companies which forced employees to take those injections are going to be bankrupted by the lawsuits they face when those same injected employees fall dead at the break-room coffee pot.  And rightfully so.

Winner Round One – Insurance Companies

Suicide? How Some Life Insurance Companies Are Dealing With Experimental Vaccines Deaths

Capitalist Exploits's Photo

THURSDAY, FEB 03, 2022 – 12:10


The last two weeks we have spent some time looking at the health insurance industry with particular focus on the campaign of… ahem, injections.

The UK government now oddly admits that vaccines have damaged the natural immune system of those who have been double-vaccinated.

The UK government has admitted that once you have been double-vaccinated, you will never again be able to acquire full natural immunity to Covid variants… or possibly any other virus.

Do we now get a “real” pandemic? In its Week 42 “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report”, the UK Department of Health admits on page 23, that “N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who become infected after two doses of vaccination.”

It goes on to say that this drop in antibodies is essentially permanent. What does this mean? We know that vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus (indeed, the report elsewhere shows that vaccinated adults are now much more likely to be infected than unvaccinated ones).

The Brits now find that the vaccine interferes with the body’s ability to make antibodies after infection not only against the spike protein but also against other parts of the virus.

In particular, vaccinated people do not appear to form antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, the envelope of the virus, which is a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. In the long term, the vaccinated are far more susceptible to any mutations in the spike protein, even if they have already been infected and cured once or more. The unvaccinated, on the other hand, will gain lasting (if not permanent) immunity to all strains of the alleged virus after being naturally infected with it even once.

Sure, we don’t expect the corrupt media to cover this, but it’s there for us to read in the government’s own reports. What’s been stunning to watch during the last two years is how the government’s various bodies put out data, independent non-mainstream journalists report on it and are immediately censored, demonized, and/or discredited with hit pieces done, while the MSM ignores it and instead provides narratives that are completely opposite.

It is, therefore, crucial to read the source material yourself so as to not be hoodwinked by propaganda.

The first insurance companies may well be the first to bring this into the open as they’ve real money at stake, and I can’t see them coughing up for claims which threaten their existence.

Here, take a look… over in the land of the guillotine an insurance company has been backed up in court after refusing to pay out a life insurance policy after the insured died from the vaccine.

Here it is important to understand legal precedent.

The definition of precedentRemember the “conversation” you had after telling your wife you’d be back for dinner, only to then spend the night having beers with your friends, stumbling in at 2am?

Yeah, that’s a precedent set.

Courts are like that, too. Once courts have established reasoning and subsequent judgements, these are relied upon in future legal battles. In short, they form the established norms.

It is therefore highly probable that in France at least deaths resulting from vaccines will be treated as suicides.

The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows:

The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.

The court had this to say:

The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.

As mentioned last week, insurers, or should we say the quants in cardigans, couldn’t and can’t adequately assess the risk associated with an experimental drug, and as such can’t insure against it.

It will be interesting to watch cases elsewhere in the world, however, the odds I think favour much of the same. The issue I see is this. The deaths that may result from ADE such as the now 20x increase in cancer cases being noted may not be easily identified as being caused by the jabs. Insurers will be on the hook for these and will be fighting with the establishment to prove causality.

While this is all playing out there are hundreds of other medical professionals noticing the same things.

So what does this mean?

Well, I can think of a couple of things. One is that the insurance industry isn’t going to let itself be hampered by political correctness and obfuscating the fact that the vaccines are experimental and that some of the short-term side effects are stated and known.

So this means that health insurance policies will come into question for those who thought they were covered but realise now they’ve jeopardized their policies. I can certainly imagine those who were coerced by employers to turn around and sue their employers for compensation, even if nothing happens to them.

Consider the case referenced above and now consider that precedent is set. Any employee that has been forced by their employer to effectively void their life insurance policy may have recourse to sue their employer for compensation.

The US, being more litigious than a trophy wife to an old rich guy, seems like it’s primed for this. Time will tell, but this could become an entire fustercluck to US companies that forced employees to experiment with drugs.

IMPORTANT - The Confirmation Link was just emailed to you when you clicked "Subscribe". Please take 20 seconds and click the confirmation link in your email, then come right back here and learn.

IMPORTANT - The Confirmation Link was just emailed to you when you clicked "Subscribe". Please take 20 seconds and click the confirmation link in your email, then come right back here and learn.

Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Do the rulers of this world worship Satan and are they involved in occult practices? The Pharisees were referred to as vipers, offspring of vipers by our Lord Yehoshua. These ‘vipers’ knew they were killing the Son of the Living God if we consider the parable of the vineyard this is not a fairy tale spoken by our Lord just to humour the people as certain religionists would make believe. That writing is evidence the Pharisees intended to kill the Son of God and take his inheritance for themselves. (Matthew 21:38). The Jews knew this was the Son of God. They knew the Son of God was due to be born in Bethlehem Matthew 2:3-6. That lawlessness was at work before the 1st century by the apostates of the 12 tribes of Israel. When Lord Rothschild was talking about the Balfour Declaration he said “We have waited 3,000 years for this!” see 2 Thessalonians 2:3-6 vs’s 7 -9. ‘ True this mystery of this lawlessness is already at work, but only until he who is… Read more »

1 year ago

But it isn’t suicide it is mass murder officiated by Pharma, Government, Media, WHO, and UN. This had to happen or the world wouldn’t believe God Almighty has any reason to annihilate all mass murderers like the battle about to begin when our King and High Priest Emmanuel is installed in power. (Emmanuel is the name of our Christ when he has taken up His sceptre and commanders staff and has begun to rule over earth see Matthew 1:22, 23 and Isaiah 8:8). Emmanuel means God Is With Us.

1 year ago
Reply to  June

To add to my previous saying it is not suicide because the people were obeying law and coercion by their rulers. Was this prophesied? see Isaiah 14:20; ‘you brought your own land to ruin, you killed your own people. To time indefinite the offspring of evildoers will not be named. see Isaiah 26:19-21, vs 21 Yahoveh is coming forth from his place to call to account the error of the inhabitant of the land against him, and the land will certainly expose her bloodshed and will no longer cover over her killed ones.

Matthew 23:27-33. Woe you scribes and Pharisees, how are you to flee from the judgment of Gehenna?

Welcome To The War
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x