Author Archives: Jerry

Obama ‘prefers Guantanamo status quo’




May 12th, 2013
Reader Views: 219

guantanamo-bay-hunger-strike.si

The deteriorating situation in Guantanamo – where a mass hunger strike has been unfolding for over two months – continues to raise the eyebrows of human rights groups. Prominent activist Medea Benjamin discusses with RT why the prison is still not closed.

Twenty-four hunger strikers are now receiving enteral feeds, with three people “being observed in the detainee hospital,” according to Guantanamo Bay Public Affairs Director Lieutenant Colonel Samuel E. House. His most recent report put the official number of hunger strikers at 100.

Although Guantanamo Bay remains open over four years after Obama pledged to close it, the President continues to voice his disapproval of the detention center.

In his first public response to the ongoing hunger strike, Obama said it was “not a surprise” that there are “problems in Guantanamo.”

“It is critical for us to understand that Guantanamo is not necessary to keep America safe. It is expensive. It is inefficient. It hurts us in terms of our international standing. It lessens cooperation with our allies on counterterrorism efforts. It is a recruitment tool for extremists. It needs to be closed,” he said in an April 30 statement.

The next day, Obama announced that he was considering hiring a new State Department official to oversee options for a future transfer of the prison’s detainees once it closes.

AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards
AFP Photo / Paul J. Richards

Earlier this month it has been revealed that keeping Guantanamo Bay running is costing the US some $150 million a year.

Medea Benjamin, author of the book “Drone Warfare,” shared her thoughts with RT on why the Obama never kept his promise to shut down the notorious detention facility.

RT: President Obama pledged to close Guantanamo when he assumed office in 2009. But over four years later, it’s still open. Why?

Medea Benjamin: People around the world are saying if the President of the United States says the prison should be closed, why is it still open? That’s a very logical question to ask. I think that the politics in the US is so partisan that the President is concerned already about who is going to be running in the next presidential election as the democratic candidate, the Congressional elections, wanting to make sure that as many democrats as possible win. The President doesn’t want to be seen as soft, and national security issues. He doesn’t think the American people care enough about this issue. And so he prefers to keep the status quo. The status quo means that desperate men are dying and are being tortured by being force-fed. That is not a status quo that we, the American people, should allow, if we want to continue to call ourselves a democracy.

RT: The prisoners’ hunger strike has been going on for over two months now, but there’s very little information coming from most media outlets. So what’s really going on there now?

AFP Photo / Toronto Star
AFP Photo / Toronto Star

MB: The prisoners who have had a chance to get messages out to their lawyers have described the terrible situation that they are in being strapped down for several hours having these tubes stuffed down the nose and into their stomach. They say it feels like a razor going down their bodies. This is another form of torture, and these prisoners have already endured years of torture in Guantanamo.

RT: The hunger strike doesn’t seem to be obtaining the prisoners’ goals, especially since you mention they are being force-fed. So why are they continuing to starve themselves?

MB: I think these inmates, or prisoners, as really what we should call them, are desperate and many of them are determined just to keep the hunger strike going. It’s difficult for them, because some of them are in isolation and they don’t know if other prisoners are continuing the hunger strike; are they being told that the other prisoners had stopped the hunger strike? I’m sure it’s a tremendous dilemma for them. But a number of those who have been able to speak through their lawyers have said they would rather die than live in these terrible conditions without ever knowing if they are going to be released.

RT: President Obama says he still believes the prison should be closed. Do you think he was sincere in his statement last month? Does he have the power to do more than he is?

MB: Obama is lacking the moral courage, he’s lacking the political will, he blames Congress, but really he has the power to release those prisoners who have already been cleared for release; demand a speedy and fair trial for the other ones and bring them into the US and close down the shameful prison of Guantanamo. We just have to force him to do it. We, the American people, the global community.

AFP Photo / Jim Watson
AFP Photo / Jim Watson

RT: What should be done with the prisoners in the unlikely event that Guantanamo is shut down sometime in the near future?

MB: One is to take the majority of prisoners, 86 of them, who have already been cleared by the US government – that means they have been found not to be guilty, not to be harmful to anybody – they should be released. The majority of them are from Yemen. The government of Yemen says they are totally prepared to take them back. There are other prisoners from countries like the United Kingdom that could certainly handle the return of prisoners. So those cleared for release should be released. The others should be sent to a prison in the US and should be tried in US courts just as other criminals are tried, many of them convicted and sentenced to life in prison.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by of .


Leave A Comment…
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


Top 5 Reasons I Carry in the Appendix Position

I’ve often tried to find others who carry how I do.  When you choose to carry concealed, you should strongly consider the benefits and disadvantages to where you’ll carry before you start lugging around a loaded gun in your pants.  I recently came across a great article on the subject, and wanted to share.

Contributed by: Rob Pincus

The “Appendix Carry” position places the gun just off your center-line, in front of you torso, towards your strong side. For a right handed person, that would be the twelve-thirty or one o’clock position if they were standing on a clock, facing towards the twelve.

Apendix CarryThis position has become more and more popular over the past few years, with many of the leading personal defense instructors not only using it, but also recommending it to their students.  Personally, I have made the switch as well. In the past, I only used this position as an alternative to four o’clock carry when in dense crowds, in order to avoid someone noticing the gun when bumping into me or to enhance retention. But, over the past few years, I’ve come to appreciate both the obvious and not-so-obvious advantages of carrying in front of the body. Here are my top five reasons for carrying in the Appendix Position:

1. Efficiency of Presentation.

Ultimately, we are carrying a defensive firearm for use in a worst-case scenario. In my training and gear selection, I subscribe to a Counter Ambush training philosophy, which means that I believe I will be behind the curve when I need my gun and that I will most likely have been startled in someway. This means that my hands will be in front of my body and I will need to get my gun into the fight quickly. In the case that I don’t get startled, it is still very likely that my hands would be in front of my body in a defensive gesture towards a potential threat. With my hands in front of my body, the fastest place for me to reach my gun will also be towards the front of my body.
When the gun is in front of the body, it can also be brought to the shooting position faster once it is out of the holster and I find the position to be inherently safer to present from, especially for new shooters, because the muzzle is in front of the body as soon as it comes out of the holster, which makes it almost impossible to “sweep” yourself during presentation (unlike carry positions that place the gun behind the point of the hip).

2. Enhanced Retention

How To Carry Concealed FirearmsIf my firearm in in front of my body while I am carrying it, it is not very likely that someone will be able to grab for it without me being aware of their presence or getting some level of contact cue in regard to the attack. Also, if I get grabbed or tackled from the front, which is how many assaults begin, the bad guy’s hands will not automatically be placed in the area where I am carrying. Lastly, it is much easier for me to get my hands onto the gun to keep it in my holster when it is carried in front of my body and I am much stronger when my hands are there than I am when my hands are at my side or behind me.

3. Ease of Close Quarters Presentation

If I need to draw my gun while in contact with a threat, a moment that Craig Douglas refers to as “In Fight Weapons Access”, it is much easier to do so without telegraphing my into when the gun is in front of my body. It is also easier to bring the gun into use against my attacker with very little motion… much less than if the gun were carried in the four or five o’clock position.

4. More efficient weak-handed Presentation

In the extreme case that I need to present my firearm with my weak hand during an extreme close quarters engagement or after injury, it is easier to do so with a strong-side-carry firearm in the Appendix Position than any other common option.

5. Comfort

I find the position to be an extremely comfortable position to carry a firearm. Admittedly, it may not fit all body types and it may take some getting used to when in the seated position. You will need to find the right holster, of course, as with any position. Personally, I use the Crossbreed Appendix Holster and/or theModular Belly Band that I helped design when carrying this way. Holster choice is very important with this style of carry… with the right holster, you could evencarry a Desert Eagle .50 in this position!

Appendix Carry may not be for everyone, but it might be perfect for you. Carry Position is one of the few areas where there really is no clear objective “right” or “wrong”… body shape, clothing style, work environment, weather and other factors affect this issue much more so than things like firearm type, caliber choice or technique selection. If you do choose to try Appendix Carry out, do so safely… with plenty of practice before you rely on it.

Will Bilderberg Summon Obama’s New Trade Representative To The Table?


Jurriaan Maessen

ExplosiveReports.Com

May 11th, 2013
Reader Views: 37

froman

President Obama recently nominated current Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economic Affairs, Michael Froman, for the post of US Trade Representative. Although the nomination requires Senate approval, it is expected Froman will soon start at his new job, not only overseeing US trade policy but to advance the “global trade agenda” pursued by the Obama administration. As member of the Council on Foreign Relations, Froman has an impressive résumé, making him a likely participant for the upcoming Bilderberg meeting near Watford in the UK.

Froman, whose career was given a boost by his former classmate and associate on the Harvard Law Review Barack Obama, will likely be further advanced by a possible participation at the coming Bilderberg conference. I would submit that the likelihood of Froman attending the coming conference is just about 90 percent. We find Froman’s predecessors attending Bilderberg and the Trilateral Commission on a regular basis. For example, Obama’s last appointee, Ron Kirk, has moved in- and out of Bilderberg-related entities on a regular basis. Former US trade Representative Susan Schwab is a member of the Trilateral Commission. The other former Trade Rep (under George W. Bush) enjoying key globalist conferences, Mr. Robert Zoellick, is a Bilderberg regular, visiting the confab so many times he must have lost count by now.

The other reason I’m speculating Froman will be present at Bilderberg 2013 is the ongoing effort to merge the two major world blocks, such as the United States and the European Union, into one overarching power-monolith. Quite recently both Froman and Kirk (his direct predecessor) admitted to the factBarack Obama is negotiating with the EU “toward a transatlantic trade and investment partnership”. During a conference call, Kirk stated that that the US and the EU should “seize the opportunity to develop new disciplines in emerging areas that have confronted trade, such as the involvement of state-owned enterprises and increasing use of localization measures as barriers to trade.”

Froman, who also made remarks at this particular conference call, pointed out that “this is potentially a very big deal. Between the U.S. and the EU, we account for almost half of global GDP.”

“(…) what Ambassador Kirk and his team have done over the last year, working with the European Commission”, Froman continued, “is to identify what those issues were and how we might be able to bridge the gap. And we think that the stars could well be aligned given developments on both sides of the Atlantic for us to be able to resolve issues that have been difficult to resolve before. And that is what we’ll be turning ourselves to next.”

Furthermore, Froman said Obama is dedicated to advance not merely a US trade agenda, but a global trade agenda:

“our goal is to achieve high standard, 21st-century style trade agreements, trade investments that advance the global trade agenda, and to introduce into the bloodstream of the multilateral trading system new disciplines and new standards for conducting international trade. And we think that this exercise with the European Union presents a very good opportunity to do just that.”

As commentator Stephen Lendman recently pointed out, Froman’s experience at negotiating trade deals are quite extensive:

“He (Froman) was White House liaison to the G7, G8, G20, and APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation) summits. He heads the Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate. He co-chairs Washington’s Transatlantic Economic Council. He’s CEO of the US-India and US-Brazil Forums. He helped negotiate South Korea, Colombia and Panama trade deals. Like NAFTA and other bilateral deals, they cost America tens of thousands of jobs. Expect more of the same ahead.”

Again: the current emphasis on synchronizing transatlantic trade agenda’s makes Froman the ideal candidate to pull up a chair next to the banking heads of Europe and the US at the Grove Hotel in the beginning of June.

At a conference on global governance and local accountability earlier this year, described by the chairman as the “big-tent church of globalization”, Obama’s old buddy lauded the European Union’s “strong degree of accountability”.

As a preface to the subject at hand (globalization and local accountability), Froman told the people present that contrary to popular belief, the EU is exemplary in its process of accountability towards its member-states (from 56 minutes, 15 seconds):

“Much has been written about the democracy-deficit in Europe”, Froman said. “My understanding is that in any week in Brussels there are 200 meetings between representatives of the member-states and members of the commission, reviewing every commission-proposed action at every stage in its gravity. When you add that to the ministerial meetings of each semester and to the now quite frequent head of state council meetings, increasingly frequent, head of state council meetings, it’s hard to say that the process of coming up with decisions in the European Union- not to mention the role of the European Parliament- doesn’t reflect a strong degree of accountability.”

A remarkable position to be taken by the then White House top adviser on economic security matters. Especially given the fact that the “euro-zone crisis” has revealed that the EU is everything but transparent or accountable to the people in Europe. Furthermore, these comments beg the question that if Obama’s top adviser on these matters lauds the EU’s transparency, which course will the US government fare in regards to its democratic processes. Froman:

“And I’ll just say from personal perspective, from personal experience, when President Obama convened the leaders of the euro-zone, and leaders of the European Union (…), to talk about the euro-zone-crisis, certainly there was a great appreciation in the room of the domestic, local, political constraints and drivers of policies, even in that pinnacle of global governance.”

If the former White House economic security guy really considers the unelected European Union “to be a “pinnacle of global governance”, where does that leave the United States in this global construct? In any case, by stating that the EU is a “pinnacle of global governance” Froman (without knowing it) concurs with two term former President of the European Commission Jacques Delors, who gave a speech to the Royal Institute of International Affairs titled The European Community and the New World Order, saying:

“Our trading partners are gradually being won over to the idea that regional integration has a dynamic impact on all, and the European model is an inspiration for others- witness the recent agreements concluded by the United States, Canada and Mexico.”

In that same speech Delors also stated that “(…) giving birth to institutions to which sovereignty is to be transferred and which are to be given power manage cooperation and settle disputes is a slow and arduous process.”

“The contribution that the Community as such can make to the new world order can, to use an image of the plant world, be considered something of a hybrid, what is produced by crossing a world power with an international organization.”

In conclusion Delor stated in 1992:

“I would add- and I will not go into detail- that economic integration, unless it is backed by a strong political will, will not in itself produce stronger international institutions or help create world government. This is why, although the need for a new world order is self-evident, our era is one of trial and error or, as the harsher critics among us would have it, of impotence, inability to take on world challenges.”

It seems that Michael Froman, for one, is impressed with the way the EU does business. For the sake of sovereignty, one hopes he does not, like the EU kingpins of old, plan to merge the US with an international organization into that transnational hybrid called world government. If we fear big government, we should decry world government, especially considering the heads of business and government of the most powerful states in the world convene in secret.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Jurriaan Maessen of ExplosiveReports.Com.


Leave A Comment…
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


SHTF Shaving Gel

Alright, I’ll keep this short and quick.

I don’t know if I’m the last guy on earth to have figured this out or not, but since nobody told me, I’m going to be the guy who tells you.

Shaving Gels are a SCAM

I’ve got thick growing facial hair, and I’ve always thought shaving gel ads that said how you’d have a smooth shave were total bullshit.  Because they never worked well for me.

Oh sure, they’re better then soap, and their better then nothing, and maybe they work fine for you if you struggle to grow facial hair.

But for me, they all suck, period.

How I Discovered The Best SHTF Shave Gel

There I was in the shower one day, getting cleaned up for an anniversary date with my wife when, oops… I dropped the soap.

That’s right, I dropped the tiniest last bit of soap I had left down the drain.

Looking around the shower I could see we were out of EVERYTHING except conditioner, and I badly needed a shave.

“What the hell?” I thought.

“I’ll give it a try.”

So I spread that conditioner onto my face and gave it a go.

I don’t want to sound over dramatic, but for a person who has always hated shaving gels, and for who shaving literally is a painful experience nearly every time… I was blown away at how wonderful hair conditioner is as a shave gel!

Seriously, if you’ve never tried it, do it tonight.  Or tomorrow morning when you shave, and tell me how it goes.

Heads and shoulders of Gillette shaving gel, that’s for sure.

So when thinking about how to take care of those pesky hygiene needs like shaving as you prepare for TEOTWAWKI think about stocking up on some conditioner for your shaving needs… that’s what I’ve done.

It’s cheaper then shave gel, and it works 10x better.

Fuel Storage Basics

By APN – Fri May 10, 6:00 am

By APN – Fri May 10, 6:00 am

Photo; smartplans.com

Photo Credit: smartplans.com

Having a supply of fuel is very important for emergency situations and disaster preparedness alike.  You never know when you might need emergency fuel for transport, heat, or cooking.  With the importance of fuel comes the importance of fuel storage.  Storing a surplus of fuel requires careful handling, planning, and an understanding of different kinds of fuel.

Different fuels have different shelf lives and necessitate different storage procedures.  As a general rule, always color code and/or label containers with different fuels.  Also, store fuel only in sturdy, durable containers with good seals.  Here is a breakdown of some large scale fuel storage tips for different kinds of fuel.

Standard Gasoline

Gasoline can be optimally stored for about two years.  After this time petroleum tends to go ‘stale’ and may not be ideal for motors.  There are, however, stabilizing agents you can buy and add to the gasoline to keep it better for longer.  Always store gas in a durable, sealed, preferably red, container out of direct sunlight in a ventilated space.

Diesel Fuel

Diesel fuel has a short shelf life–anywhere from 6-12 months.  Because diesel fuel oxidizes after it leaves the refinery and sediments form that can clog motors, stabilizers should be added to the fuel to slow this process.  Diesel should not be stored for more than two months, so use up the supply in a vehicle or generator then rotate your supply.

Propane

Propane should always be stored outdoors in a well-ventilated area.  Place the propane tank upright on concrete away from any other flammable objects or liquids.  Storing away from wet areas or places where large amounts of water won’t fall on the tank is also a good idea to prevent rust on the tank cylinder.

Kerosene

Kerosene doesn’t evaporate as quickly as gasoline and can remain stable while being stored without any extra treatments.  Because of this, kerosene is an easy and popular fuel to store.  Make sure kerosene containers are well labeled and possibly stored in a different colored container than gasoline or other fuels.  Kerosene has a shelf life of about 3 months and there is a risk of mold forming in the containers for longer storage, so rotate your kerosene.

Butane

While less popular in large scale fuel storage than propane or kerosene, butane has a variety of uses in heating and cooking.  If you need to throw on a pack and take to the woods, butane can be your companion for cooking and starting fires.  Store butane in a cool, dry place out of direct sun.  The canisters have a high resistance to heat, but always keep them out of extreme temperatures for good measure.

Dry Fuel (Charcoal, Coal, Wood)

The dry fuels are the easiest to store since they are not extremely volatile compounds like most liquid fuels.  Most of the time having canisters, waterproof containers, and a dedicated area for the fuel is the best storage plan.  Keep firewood away from the house and covered to prevent it getting wet if left out in the open.  Both coal and charcoal should be kept dry and in some kind of container or bin.  Make sure to keep these fuels separate from any flammable liquids.

 

by Ben Vaughn

About The Author

APN

APN is a(n)
Management Account
with The APN who has written 122 article(s).

Articles by Guest Authors are posted through this account. Author credit is typically included at the end of the article (when credit information has been provided by the author).

Would you like to submit an article to the APN?

We would love to have you submit an article to us! Please review our General, Submission and Content Guidelines for Guest Authors and follow the instructions there for Submitting your story. Thanks!

Marines, Boy Scouts & 4-Key Steps to a Bug Out Bag

By Gary Stevens – Fri May 10, 6:00 am

BSA prepared for life

Courtesy of: Boy Scouts of America

 

The greatest motto for any organization was trademarked by the  Boy Scout, which is, ‘Be Prepared.’  I spent a combined total of 32 years in the Marine Corp the Boy Scouts (BSA). My experience has taught me a thing or two about being prepared. Regardless of all the over-nighters I’ve been on, my education did not come over night.  Correct principles of preparedness are discovered through long and uncomfortable situation and mistakes, and sometimes it’s down right painful.  The painful lessons usually came from my beloved Marine Corps.  The sum of the experience can be restated as a quote from a former platoon sergeant,

“You may love the Marine Corps, but some time she won’t love you back!”  

 In preparing for the worst and hoping for the best, you will discover that preparedness does not come in a “one size fits all” label. The perfect solution is defined with experience  balance to achieve your specific mission (goals, purpose).

Over the years, I have considered the best balance of critical points to cover. I’ve come up with 4 key points to the bug out bag.  I put them in the order of importance to what I have found through my own experience and time in the field.

Bug Out Bag | Hydration

 The three critical principles of hydration are collection, purification storage.  As your day and activities unfold, hydration will be one of the most important items to continually consider.  An Infamous Marine-ism from an old Gunny of mine states,

“If you don’t need to pee, you’re wrong.  Drink!”  

Hydration is second only to personal safety while in the field or just being out and about. An adage of the Israeli Special Forces Instructors is to hydrate every three kilometers. A body in motion needs water, continually!  Those headaches or migraines the morning after camping, hunting, or patrolling is from dehydration; especially if there is any consumption of other types of beverages that are enjoyed after the fermentation process.

Bug out Bag | Prepared to Survive 

 

This is a broad sweeping point that could cover everything from an emergency Mylar blanket to a Bic lighter. Here is a list of the survival items I carry:

  • 3 different methods for starting a fire, I also carry 2 types of catalyst for sustaining the fire
  • Small Gerber hatchet
  • Leather-man Tool
  • Pair of leather palm, light weight, work gloves
  • ‘Head Light’ hands free flash light
  • 1/2 dozen instant hand warmers
  • 550 cord, mil-spec
  • duct tape, small roll
  • military lensatic compass
  • Sun screen
  • Bug spray
  • Jet Boil stove
  • Freeze dried food packages
  • Combat Application Tourniquet, called a CAT

Note: I may only keep some of the freeze dried food in the bag that I think I’ll need, or just an emergency ration instead of meals for days.  You can live with out food if you have to, but you CAN NOT live with out water for very long.  Some of the meals I may remove for weight consideration, I substitute other items that I will cover in the last section I labeled Personal/Extra Stuff. I have learned that a water proofed bag, with water proofed gear inside, makes for a less miserable experience while in the field.  So I have learned which store bought zip-lock plastic bags work best for water proofing your gear.  About 90% of all my gear in my bag is water proofed to some extent.  My lighters, extra socks, sun screen, and even my bug spray is a plastic baggy.

gary stevens 2Bug Out Bag | First Aid 

First aid equipment should always be water-proofed, and using ziplock baggies is inexpensive, light-weight easy. If I go any where, first aid items are always with me:

  • EMT Sheers (1)
  • Ace Bandage (1-2)
  • 2 in. Coban wrap, 2+yards in length
  • Gauze Wrap (5)
    • individually packaged, then all in their own larger water proof bag

The items below are in their own large water proof bag, some items are grouped together in smaller baggies for ease of use and for organizational purposes.  This is the ziplock bag I carry everywhere, it never leaves my Bag. 

  • Moleskin and Blister bandages
  • Extra pair of boot laces
  • Small bottle of Tylenol
  • Medium mixed bottle of Ibuprofen, Naproxin, and Excedrin
  • A couple tabs of Sudaphed
  • Gold Bond body powder (travel size)
  • Blistex lip balm
  • Butterfly bandaged
  • Super Glue (liquid bandage)
  • Assorted Band-Aids (20)
  • Alcohol wipes
  • Neosporin
  • Eye drops
  • 1/2″ water proof adhesive tape
  • Folding toothbrush (travel size)
  • Tooth paste (travel size)
  • 1″ Coban wrap, 2+ yards

Bug Out Bag | Personal/Extra Comforts

G. Stevens: Iraq, 2007

G. Stevens: Iraq, 2007

These are items that I would consider optional, for reasons of weight or the dictation of the terrain.  Situation and terain will usually dictate what you have, how much of it you have.  Know that even though I have labeled this fourth and final point as extra gear, I usually roll with everything I have listed.  It’s rare that I’d omit anything from this list:

  • Wet Wipes; I like the Huggies, 16 count, slim hard case, which also happens to be sold sealed in plastic (water proofed)
  • Extra socks, water proofed in a plastic bag
  • Note pad and/or 3X5 cards, plus writing utensils (gel pens don’t freeze as easy, black sharpie markers are great for the field too)
  • Monocular
  • Bandanna and a wash-cloth, sealed in their own baggy together
  • Long sleeve, Thermal type, under shirt for an extra DRY base layer if needed at night
  • 2, short range, walkie-talkies; with weather reception capability
  • Extra batteries, for head lamp and walkie-talkies, both take AAA batt (not a coincidence)
  • 20′ of 1″ webbing
  • 5′ dog leash 
  • Appox. 8 carabiners (3 diff sizes and types)
  • Pelican Case 1010 (this is my camera case, I use our old model digital camera when in the field, Iraq-tested approved)
  • 3-5 cans of Vienna Sausages (they are small and light weight, perfect poggie-bait)
  • Boonie hat
  • Empty and folded plastic Wal~Mart grocery bags, for trash or whatever (light-weight; no bulk)
  • Black stretchy gloves (Wally World, 2 pair for $1.50. And they are in their own little plastic baggie for water proofing purposes)

Bug Out Bag | Avoiding Gear Bombs Ensuring A Safe Return

I have been out and about in inclement weather.  It was a crap shoot if I knew the weather was going to turn bad on me, but I always planned for the worst and hoped for the best.  I always had a few essentials that turned the miserable, to tolerable.  Sometimes I’d end up giving my gear to a junior Marine who had not yet learned how fickle Mother Nature could be.

Questions I plan around are below. Safety returning home are always the end goal.

  • What items will my family need?
  • What items will I need?
  • What is the Terrain?
  • What types of immediate problems that may occur? 

I believe in water proofing as much as possible.  I’ve got a great system for individual water proofing items in baggies.  I have also found that combining a lot of my small first aid items into a larger baggie, for organisational purposes.  I don’t want a gear bomb going off at the wrong time and have to find collect my gear.  Keep it simple, keep it organized.  My last Marine-ism sums up this thought, and one of the great lessons I learned in the Corp –  It comes from a Master Gunnery Sergeant,

“There is no reason to practice being uncomfortable and miserable, those opportunities present themselves often in the Corps, and at regular intervals.”

I am grateful for the difficulties I have faced, they have taught me and I hope to pay it forward. 

Sempre Fi – Be Prepared. Over.

Click Here To Submit A Question

Click Here To Submit A Question

 

Helping Others Help Themselves: 

Need assistance or have a question for Gary about Bug Out Bags? Click Here

About The Author

Gary Stevens is a(n)
with The APN who has written 1 article(s).

THE 3D GUN HAS BEEN BANNED: “The United States Government Claims Control of The Information” *Black Market Download Links Available*

Liberator-3D-Printed-Gun

Last weekend Cody Wilson and his team of gun access advocates at Defense Distributed broke ground with the introduction of the first ever 3D printed gun capable of firing a live round. Immediately after the organization developed proof of concept by firing a .380 caliber round through their new CAD designed and plastic printed Liberator handgun, they released the blueprints for the gun to the general public via their DefCad.org web site.

Over 50,000 users immediately flocked to the site to get a free copy of the plans, which anyone with a 3D printer could then use to print their own handgun.

Gun control proponents went into overdrive against the new technology. By Monday, Senator Charles Schumer of New York, who claimed the developments were “stomach churning” and “must be stopped,” was already in the process of drafting legislation that would ban access to the new technology. Gun control proponents within the Obama administration immediate started looking for a way to shut it down.

Today, they found a way. The government, through the enforcement division of US Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance, has demanded that Defense Distributed remove access to all plans for The Liberator project claiming that it may violate the Arms Export Control Act by releasing technical data without prior authorization from the Directorate of Defense Trade.

What this means is that Defense Distributed has allegedly disclosed the gun’s plans illegally.

But here’s the kicker.

They didn’t violate the law by disclosing the blueprints to American citizens. Rather, they are being forced to remove America’s access to the plans because the technical data made available on their wiki web site was accessible by foreign states or individuals, an action which apparently requires authorization from the United States government.

The letter, issued by the US Department of State, says:

“DTCC/END is conducting a review of technical data made publicly available by Defense Distributed through its 3D printing website, DEFCAD.org, the majority of which appear to be related to items in Category I of the USML. Defense Distributed may have released ITAR-controlled technical data without required prior authorization from the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC), a violation of the ITAR.”

….

“The Department believes Defense Distributed may not have established the proper jurisdiction of the subject technical data. To resolve this matter officially, we request that Defense Distributed submit Commodity Jurisdiction (CJ) determination requests for the following selection of data files available on DEFCAD.org, and any other technical data for which Defense Distributed is unable to determine proper jurisdiction:

1. Defense Distributed Liberator pistol
2. .22 el3ectric
3. 125mm BK-14M high-explosive anti-tank warhead
4. 5.56/.223 muzzle brake
5. Springfield XD-40 tactical slide assembly
6. Sound Moderator – slip on
7. “The Dirty Diane” ½-28 to 3/4-16 STP S3600 oil filter silencer adapter
8. 12 gauge .22 CB sub-caliber insert
9. Voltlock electronic black powder system
10. VZ-58 front sight”

The letter goes on, “Until the Department provides Defense Distributed with final CJ determinations, Defense Distributed should treat the above technical data as ITAR-controlled. This means that all such data should be removed from public access immediately. Defense Distributed should also review the remainder of the data made public on its website to determine whether any additional data may be similarly controlled and proceed according to ITAR requirements.”

Made available by Infowars.com

Adam Salazar reports that the DefCad web site had posted an alert to their readers regarding the government’s takedown order.

defcad-takedown

DefDist Liberator Pistol: The File has been removed from public access at the request of the US Department of Defense Trade Controls. Until further notice, the United States government claims control of the information.

Access to the file has been removed by Defense Distributed at this time, as their failure to comply would likely lead to the all so familiar “This web site has been seized by the Department of Homeland Security” banner and a host of legal filings by the federal government, including the possible revocation of the Federal Firearms License.

The thousands of copies that were downloaded when the blueprints were first made available are now making their way to the black markets of the internet, a common side effect of all manner of government censorship and intervention into the free market.

It has already popped up at Torrent network like Pirate Bay, were it can be readily downloaded by anyone who would like a copy, including foreigners and their governments.

You can visit the following links to download the complete Liberator blueprint, which were still available at the time of this writing:

The Liberator - 16 Pieces

An administrator at the DefCad forums posted the following warning regarding the government’s takedown and the current status of The Liberator and 3D firearms based on its plans:

I’ll be bringing in legal authority and FAQ, but for now, if you are not a registered FFL/SOT:

1. DO NOT print a completely polymer firearm capable of firing a bullet (barrel inserts or no), as you will likely create anNFA regulated firearm. Specifically, you will likely create an AOW zip gun.2.

DO NOT print a completely polymer firearm capable of firing a bullet (barrel inserts or no), as you will likely violate the so-called Undetectable Firearms Act.

Not listening to items 1 and 2 means you are on your way to committing a Federal crime. Because of the public profile and interest over this kind of activity at the moment, you WILL be made an example of. You WILL go to federal prison, and you WILL never be able to own a firearm again.

« Last Edit: January 28, 2013, 01:06:02 AM by DEFCAD

 

Mac Slavo
SHTFplan.com

America’s Roads Have Been Turned Into A Revenue Generating Surveillance Grid

Traffic Stop - Photo by DarkKomodoWhat do speed traps, parking tickets, toll roads, speed cameras and red light cameras all have in common?  They are all major revenue sources for state and local governments.  All over America today there are state and local governments that are drowning in debt.  Many have chosen to use “traffic enforcement” as a way to raise desperately needed revenue.  According to the National Motorist Association, issuing speeding tickets raises somewhere between 4.5 billion and 6 billion dollars in the United States each year.  And the average price of a speeding ticket just keeps going up.  Today, the national average is about $150, but in many jurisdictions it is far higher.  For example, more than 16 million traffic tickets are issued in the state of California each year, and the average fine is approximately $250.  If you are wealthy that may not be much of a problem, but if you are a family that is barely scraping by every month that can be a major financial setback.  Meanwhile, America’s roads are also being systematically transformed into a surveillance grid.  The number of cameras watching our roads is absolutely exploding, and automated license plate readers are capturing hundreds of millions of data points on all of us.  As you drive down the highway, a police vehicle coming up behind you can instantly read your license plate and pull up a whole host of information about you.  This happened to me a few years ago.  I had pulled on to a very crowded highway in Virginia and within less than a minute a cop car had scanned me and was pulling me over because one of my stickers had expired.  But these automated license plate readers are being used for far more than just traffic enforcement now.  For example, officials in Washington D.C. are now using automated license plate readers to track the movements of every single vehicle that enters the city.  They know when you enter Washington, and they know when you leave.  So where is all of this headed?  Do we really want to live in a “Big Brother” society where the government constantly tracks all of our movements?

Back in the old days, the highways of America were great examples to the rest of the world of the tremendous liberties and freedoms that we enjoyed.  Americans loved to hop into their vehicles and take a drive.  But now government is sucking all of the fun out of driving.  The control freak bureaucrats that dominate our political system have figured out that giant piles of money can be raised by turning our roads into revenue raising tools.

At this point things have gotten so bad that even some police officers are admitting what is going on.  Just check out what a few of them told Car and Driver

The president of a state police union isn’t pretending it doesn’t happen. James Tignanelli, president of the Police Officers Association of Michigan union, says, “When elected officials say, ‘We need more money,’ they can’t look to the department of public works to raise revenues, so where do they find it? Police departments.

“A lot of police chiefs will tell you the goal is to have nobody speeding through their community, but heaven forbid if it should actually happen—they’d be out of money,” Tignanelli says.

Police Chief Michael Reaves of Utica, Michigan, says the role of law enforcement has changed over the years. “When I first started in this job 30 years ago, police work was never about revenue enhancement, but if you’re a chief now, you have to look at whether your department produces revenues,” he says. “That’s just the reality nowadays.”

And as the economy has gone downhill, many jurisdictions have massively jacked up traffic fines.  According to the Los Angeles Times, various traffic fines in the Los Angeles area are far higher than they once were…

If you’re caught running a red light in Los Angeles, be prepared to shell out $446, up from $271 eight years ago. Make a rolling right turn at a stoplight and the ticket comes to $381 — more than double what it cost in 2008.

And of course the cost to the driver does not end with the ticket.  Your car insurance will likely go up as well.  In fact, one study found that a driver that just gets one speeding ticket will pay an additional 20 percent for car insurance for the next three to six years.

That can add up to a lot of money.

But politicians just keep wanting to find a way to issue even more tickets.  One of the hottest trends all over the country is to automate the issuing of traffic tickets by installing cameras.  According to USA Today, this has become a huge growth industry…

Sales of the cameras have nearly quadrupled since companies moved to digital and wireless technology in the mid-2000s. The number of local contracts for cameras was up to 689 last year, from 155 in 2005, according to industry data complied by market leader American Traffic Solutions (ATS).

And these automated traffic cameras can raise an enormous amount of cash.  Just check out what has been happening in Washington D.C.

The speeding and traffic light cameras have become more lucrative as their number in the District has increased. Combined, they issued tickets valued at $24.4 million in 2007. That figure more than doubled by 2010, to $50.9 million, and it reached $84.9 million in the last fiscal year.

But as annoying as those traffic cameras are, automated license plate readers are perhaps even more insidious.

The amount of data that these automated license plate readers are capturing is astounding.  The following is from a recent article by the Electronic Frontier Foundation

Photographing a single license plate one time on a public city street may not seem problematic, but when that data is put into a database, combined with other scans of that same plate on other city streets, and stored forever, it can become very revealing. Information about your location over time can show not only where you live and work, but your political and religious beliefs, your social and sexual habits, your visits to the doctor, and your associations with others. And, according to recent research reported in Nature, it’s possible to identify 95% of individuals with as few as four randomly selected geospatial datapoints (location + time), making location data the ultimate biometric identifier.

Our license plates have essentially become “our papers” which the government can read whenever it would like without even asking for our permission.

According to L.A. Weekly, local police agencies in the L.A. area have captured more than 160 million data points on private citizens using these automated license plate readers…

L.A. Weekly has learned that more than two dozen law enforcement agencies in Los Angeles County are using hundreds of these “automatic license plate recognition” devices (LPRs) — units about the size of a paperback book, usually mounted atop police cruisers — to devour data on every car that catches their electronic eye.

The L.A. County Sheriff’s Department and the Los Angeles Police Department are two of the biggest gatherers of automatic license plate recognition information. Local police agencies have logged more than 160 million data points — a massive database of the movements of millions of drivers in Southern California.

Each data point represents a car and its exact whereabouts at a given time. Police have already conducted, on average, some 22 scans for every one of the 7,014,131 vehicles registered in L.A. County.

As the use of these devices becomes more widespread and they become even more sophisticated, eventually the government will know where almost all of us are and what almost all of us are doing at all times.

The following is a brief except from a Washington Post article that detailed how automated license plate readers are now being used to create a “dragnet” that will track the movements of all vehicles from the time that they enter Washington D.C. to the time that they leave…

More than 250 cameras in the District and its suburbs scan license plates in real time, helping police pinpoint stolen cars and fleeing killers. But the program quietly has expanded beyond what anyone had imagined even a few years ago.

With virtually no public debate, police agencies have begun storing the information from the cameras, building databases that document the travels of millions of vehicles.

Nowhere is that more prevalent than in the District, which has more than one plate-reader per square mile, the highest concentration in the nation. Police in the Washington suburbs have dozens of them as well, and local agencies plan to add many more in coming months, creating a comprehensive dragnet that will include all the approaches into the District.

This is just the beginning.

For now, as long as you carefully obey all traffic laws and you don’t work in a major city like Washington D.C., the changes that are happening probably do not affect you too much.

But the key is to see where all of this is going.  Our roads are slowly but surely being transformed into a revenue generating control grid.  And this is just yet another example of how government feels the need to constantly watch, monitor, track and regulate everything that we do.

Does anyone else feel like the life is slowly being choked out of our society, or am I alone?

Traffic Stop Photo By Jeff Dean

How Elites and Media Minimize Dissent and Bury Truth


Paul Craig Roberts

Institute for Political Economy

May 10th, 2013
Reader Views: 38

How Elites and Media Minimize Dissent and Bury TruthOver the last several years I have watched the rise of an important new intellect on the American scene. Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, has demonstrated time and again the extraordinary ability to reexamine settled issues and show that the accepted conclusion was incorrect.

One of his early achievements was to dispose of the myth of immigrant crime by demonstrating that “Hispanics have approximately the same crime rates as whites of the same age and gender.” You can imagine the uproar, but Unz won the debate.

Unz provoked and prevailed in another controversy when he concluded that Mexican-Americans have approximately the same innate intelligence as whites, with their lower IQs being due to transitory socio-economic deprivation.

He next surprised by showing the connection between the declining real value of the minimum wage (about one-third less than in the 1960s) and immigration. Americans cannot survive on one-third less minimum income than four decades ago, and the unfilled jobs are taken by Hispanics who live many to the room. A higher minimum wage, Unz pointed out, would cure the illegal immigration problem as American citizens would fill the jobs.

I wrote about some of Unz’s remarkable findings. One of my favorites is his comparison of the responsiveness of the Chinese and US governments to their publics. I found his conclusion convincing that the authoritarian one-party Chinese government was more responsive to the Chinese people than democratic two-party Washington is to the American people.

The person is rare who can take on such controversial issues in such a professional way that he wins the admiration even of his critics. In my opinion, Ron Unz is a national resource. He has established online libraries of important periodicals and magazines from the pre-Internet era, information that otherwise essentially would be lost. I have not met him, but he donates to this site and is an independent thinker free of The Matrix.

Unz’s latest article, “Our American Pravda,” (http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/our-american-pravda/) is a striking account of the failure of media, regulatory, and national security organizations and subsequent coverups that leave the public deceived. Unz uses the Iraq war as one example:

“The circumstances surrounding our Iraq War demonstrate this, certainly ranking it among the strangest military conflicts of modern times. The 2001 attacks in America were quickly ascribed to the radical Islamists of al-Qaeda, whose bitterest enemy in the Middle East had always been Saddam Hussein’s secular Baathist regime in Iraq. Yet through misleading public statements, false press leaks, and even forged evidence such as the “yellowcake” documents, the Bush administration and its neoconservative allies utilized the compliant American media to persuade our citizens that Iraq’s nonexistent WMDs posed a deadly national threat and required elimination by war and invasion. Indeed, for several years national polls showed that a large majority of conservatives and Republicans actually believed that Saddam was the mastermind behind 9/11 and the Iraq War was being fought as retribution. Consider how bizarre the history of the 1940s would seem if America had attacked China in retaliation for Pearl Harbor.

“True facts were easily available to anyone paying attention in the years after 2001, but most Americans do not bother and simply draw their understanding of the world from what they are told by the major media, which overwhelmingly—almost uniformly—backed the case for war with Iraq; the talking heads on TV created our reality. Prominent journalists across the liberal and conservative spectrum eagerly published the most ridiculous lies and distortions passed on to them by anonymous sources, and stampeded Congress down the path to war.

“The result was what my late friend Lt. Gen. Bill Odom rightly called the “greatest strategic disaster in United States history.” American forces suffered tens of thousands of needless deaths and injuries, while our country took a huge step toward national bankruptcy [and a police state]. Economics Nobel Laureate Joseph Stiglitz and others have estimated that with interest the total long-term cost of our two recent wars may reach as high as $5 or $6 trillion, or as much as $50,000 per American household, mostly still unpaid. Meanwhile, economist Edward Wolff has calculated that the Great Recession and its aftermath cut the personal net worth of the median American household to $57,000 in 2010 from a figure nearly twice as high three years earlier. Comparing these assets and liabilities, we see that the American middle class now hovers on the brink of insolvency, with the cost of our foreign wars being a leading cause.

“But no one involved in the debacle ultimately suffered any serious consequences, and most of the same prominent politicians and highly paid media figures who were responsible remain just as prominent and highly paid today. For most Americans, reality is whatever our media organs tell us, and since these have largely ignored the facts and adverse consequences of our wars in recent years, the American people have similarly forgotten. Recent polls show that only half the public today believes that the Iraq War was a mistake.”

Unz covers a number of cases of criminality, treason, and coverups at high levels of government and points out that “these dramatic, well-documented accounts have been ignored by our national media.” One reason for “this wall of uninterest” is that both parties are complicit and thus equally eager to bury the facts.

Unz is raising the question of the efficacy of democracy. Does the way democracy works in America provide any more self-rule than in undemocratic regimes? He offers this example:

“Most of the Americans who elected Barack Obama in 2008 intended their vote as a total repudiation of the policies and personnel of the preceding George W. Bush administration. Yet once in office, Obama’s crucial selections—Robert Gates at Defense, Timothy Geither at Treasury, and Ben Bernake at the Federal Reserve—were all top Bush officials, and they seamlessly continued the unpopular financial bailouts and foreign wars begun by his predecessor, producing what amounted to a third Bush term.”

In an article not long ago, I raised the issue whether Americans live in The Matrix with their perceptions and thoughts controlled by disinformation as in George Orwell’s 1984.

Unz adds to this perspective. He tells the story of Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky’s plan to transform Russia into a make-believe two-party state complete with heated battles fought on divisive and symbolic issues. Behind the scenes the political elites would orchestrate the political battles between the parties with the purpose of keeping the population divided and funneling popular dissatisfaction into meaningless dead-end issues. In such a system, self-serving power prevails. After describing Berezovsky’s plot, Unz asks if Berezovsky got his idea from observing the American political scene.

Thinking further about the propagandistic nature of the US media, Unz writes:

“Individuals from less trusting societies are often surprised at the extent to which so many educated Americans tend to believe whatever the media tells them and ignore whatever it does not, placing few constraints on even the most ridiculous propaganda. For example, a commentator on my article described the East German media propaganda he had experienced prior to Reunification as being in many respects more factual and less totally ridiculous than what he now saw on American cable news shows. One obvious difference was that Western media was so globally dominant during that era that the inhabitants of the German Democratic Republic inevitably had reasonable access to a contrasting second source of information, forcing their media to be much more cautious in its dishonesty, while today almost any nonsense uniformly supported by the MSNBC-to-FoxNews spectrum of acceptable opinion remains almost totally unquestioned by most Americans.” http://www.theamericanconservative.com/american-pravda-reality-television/

Unz’s view of the US media as propagandists for power is consistent with that of John Pilger, one of the last remaining real journalists who refuses to serve power, and with Gerald Celente, who sums up the sordid American media in one word–”presstitutes.” I know from my own media experience that an independent print and TV media no longer exists in the West. The American media is a tightly controlled disinformation ministry.

Those few Americans who are free of the constraints imposed by dogmas on their ability to think and to process information have a huge responsibility for their small number. The assault on the rule of law began in the last years of the Clinton regime, but the real destruction of the US Constitution, the basis for the United States, was achieved by the neoconservative George W. Bush and Obama regimes. Wars without declarations by Congress, torture in violation of both US and international law, war crimes in violation of the Nuremberg standard, indefinite detention and assassination of US citizens without due process of law, universal spying on US citizens without warrants, federalization of state and local police now armed with military weapons and uniforms, detention centers, “your papers, please” (without the Gestapo “please”) not only at airports but also on highways, streets, bus terminals, train stations, and at sporting events.

On May 5 Obama gave the commencement address at Ohio State University. No doubt that the graduates thought that they were being honored by being addressed by the world’s greatest tyrant.

Obama told the graduating class, to applause, that their obligation as citizens is to trust the government. Outdoing George Orwell’s Big Brother, Obama said in public to a graduating class of a great university without shame: “You have grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as . . . some sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems; some of these same voices also doing their best to gum up the works. They’ll warn that tyranny is always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.”

Listen to my propaganda, not to those constitutional experts, legal authorities, and critics of me, the First Black President, who tell you to beware of unaccountable government. Due process is decided by the demands of the war on terror. If there is a war on terror, do you want a fair trial or do you want to be safe? I am going to make you safe by not giving defendants accused of terrorism, who some liberal-pinko-commie judge would set free, a fair trial.

Making you safe by enveloping you in a police state is a nonpartisan undertaking. Just listen to Lindsay Graham and Peter King and John McCain. These Republican leaders are demanding the police state that I am providing.

As my own legal department, The US Department Of Justice, decided, the Dictator, I mean, elected president, has the power to save the country from domestic and foreign terrorists by abrogating the US Constitution, an out-of-date document that binds our hands and prevents us from keeping you, our serfs and minions, I mean our cherished citizens, safe.

Trust me. That is your obligation as a US citizen. Trust me and I will make you free, happy, employed sometime later in this century when the Amerikan Empire controls the world.

The US Constitution was written by people who opposed Empire. These people were misguided, just like the Roman Republicans who did not understand the need for a Caesar. The American Empire, as the neoconservatives have made clear, is what keeps you free from terrorism. We have to kill them over there before they come over here. And those who are over here will be killed too. We tolerate no dissent. That part of the Constitution is gone, along with the rest of it.

Now give me my honorary doctorate, another sign of approval of my usurpation.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple


Contributed by Paul Craig Roberts of Institute for Political Economy.

About Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Visit his web site at the Institute for Political Economy.

This article has been posted with permission from Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.

Copyright Paul Craig Roberts 2012.


Leave A Comment…
The Daily Sheeple Home Page


The City Slicker’s Guide to Felling Trees and Chopping Wood

By APN – Thu May 09, 6:00 am

By APN – Thu May 09, 6:00 am

wood-5114_1280For those who have spent most, if not all of their lives trapped in a decidedly more efficient, but no less primitive urban landscape, the idea of chopping down a large tree and turning the fallen timber into perfectly cut pieces of firewood was probably not something you had to confront.  But perhaps you always had a void within yourself and the time has finally come to fill that hollow with a chainsaw and an axe. 

Felling Trees

There is a precise technique to properly chopping down a tree. This is hard work and can be dangerous if not done right. Depending on the size of the tree–width and height, this process can take  mere minutes to many hours.  You’ll first need a good pair of comfortable shoes, protective eye-wear, work gloves, and a good chainsaw.  If the notion of felling a tree with an axe entered your mind, you should rid yourself of that idea rather quick after a couple swings against a well armored tree trunk.  Buy or borrow a chainsaw!

Depending on the context in which you’re felling the tree, you will either have an experienced companion assisting you, or you will undoubtedly be prepared to dispatch the tree on your own accord with all the necessary equipment and a very specific reason.  If neither of these are true, what are you even doing in the woods? Just get back in your car and drive home; you’re probably doing something illegal anyway.

Once you’re ready to initiate the first step in your Natty Bumppo wilderness fantasy, it’s important you follow a few critical points in assessing and making cuts in the tree.  First, determine the direction of fall and make the first cut a third of a way into the tree, parallel to the ground on the side you want the tree to fall.

Next, make a 60 degree angle downward cut until you meet the first cut. This should take out a large triangle of wood from the tree.  At this point you’ve made the face cut that will guide the tree as it falls. You can now move to the opposite side of the tree and set the blade parallel to the ground a couple of inches above the bottom of the face cut.  Cut horizontally into the trunk until there is just a strip of uncut trunk.  This should keep the tree from kickback as it falls.  Finally, cut the strip until the tree begins to topple.  Turn off the saw and retreat.  Don’t look back until you are a safe distance away and hear the thud.

Chopping Wood

Perhaps the quintessential act of rustic manliness, chopping wood is an artful labor.  This isn’t to say that the work is gender specific, but let’s face it, chopping wood just appears brutish.  The trick one aspires to achieve chopping wood is working with the wood rather than against it.  In general, properly cutting wood is as precision oriented as felling the tree beforehand.  Fortunately, chopping wood is a simple and easy to hone technique, you will chop cleaner and faster with practice.

First, gather the need the tools.  Good work gloves, a sturdy axe, and some splitting wedges to initially crack open the wood.  Also, a short chopping block for resistance is needed to chop the wood into smaller pieces.  This is also necessary to protect the blade of your axe from damage when it breaks through the wood.

Set the piece of wood on the block and stand back with feet apart and arms extended.  Then line up the axe over the wood, raise it, and strike.  This will take practice to get right and may require adjustment to determine the best parts of the wood to strike.  Look for well-formed cracks to hit and let the weight of the axe do most of the work.  This will usually cause the wood to easily come apart, but sometimes you may need to strike along the sides to avoid getting the axe struck in a thick log.

For the toughest pieces of wood, you can use the wedges to facilitate the splitting.  Tap one of the wedges into the log and strike it in until the wood begins to split.  You can also whittle away the log around the sides until the log is small enough to split down the center more easily.  With practice, you can become a highly efficient wood-cutter.  The best part is that you can take this skill anywhere.  You’ll soon be the go-to firewood source.  Just remember your flannel shirt and steel-toed boots!

 

By Ben Vaughn

About The Author

APN

APN is a(n)
Management Account
with The APN who has written 121 article(s).

Articles by Guest Authors are posted through this account. Author credit is typically included at the end of the article (when credit information has been provided by the author).

Would you like to submit an article to the APN?

We would love to have you submit an article to us! Please review our General, Submission and Content Guidelines for Guest Authors and follow the instructions there for Submitting your story. Thanks!

Explore More!